Dissonancia: Critical Theory Journal https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica <p>Revista eletrônica de teoria crítica do Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas/Unicamp (ISSN: 2594-5025).<br><br></p> pt-BR Dissonancia: Critical Theory Journal 2594-5025 "Preface (1922)" https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica/article/view/5231 Konstantin Baehrens Copyright (c) 2023 Konstantin Baehrens https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2023-12-31 2023-12-31 7 1 26 "What is Orthodox Marxism?" https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica/article/view/5232 Alexandros Minotakis Copyright (c) 2023 Alexandros Minotakis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2023-12-31 2023-12-31 7 1 23 "The Marxism of Rosa Luxemburg" https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica/article/view/5233 Ankica Čakardić Copyright (c) 2023 Ankica Čakardić https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2023-12-31 2023-12-31 7 1 12 "Class consciousness" https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica/article/view/5234 Eden Young Copyright (c) 2023 Eden Young https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2023-12-31 2023-12-31 7 1 13 "The phenomenon of reification" https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica/article/view/5235 Victor Strazzeri Copyright (c) 2023 Victor Strazzeri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2023-12-31 2023-12-31 7 1 19 "The antinomies of bourgeois thought" https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica/article/view/5236 Giovanni Zanotti Copyright (c) 2023 Giovanni Zanotti https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2023-12-31 2023-12-31 7 1 27 "The standpoint of the proletariat" https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica/article/view/5237 Mariana Teixeira Copyright (c) 2023 Mariana Teixeira https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2023-12-31 2023-12-31 7 1 12 "Historical materialism's change of function" https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica/article/view/5238 Victor Strazzeri Copyright (c) 2023 Victor Strazzeri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2023-12-31 2023-12-31 7 1 28 "Legality and illegality" https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica/article/view/5239 Costas Gousis Copyright (c) 2023 Costas Gousis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2023-12-31 2023-12-31 7 1 8 "Critical observations on Rosa Luxemburg's 'Critique of the Russian Revolution'" https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica/article/view/5240 Anita Zsurzsán Copyright (c) 2023 Anita Zsurzsán https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2023-12-31 2023-12-31 7 1 9 "Towards a methodology of the problem of organisation" https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica/article/view/5241 Dimitra Alifieraki Copyright (c) 2023 Dimitra Aliferaki https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2023-12-31 2023-12-31 7 1 9 "Preface to the new edition (1967)" https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica/article/view/5242 Konstantin Baehrens Copyright (c) 2023 Konstantin Baehrens https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2023-12-31 2023-12-31 7 1 28 Eros und Erkenntnis ou a promessa da filosofia de Theodor W. Adorno https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica/article/view/5158 <p style="margin-bottom: 2.5cm; font-style: normal; line-height: 100%; orphans: 2; widows: 2;" align="justify"><span style="color: #666666;"><span style="font-family: Linux Libertine;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Resenha de <em>Eros und Erkenntnis – 50 Jahre “Ästhetische Theorie”, </em>organizado por de Martin Endres, Axel Pichler e Claus Zittel (Berlim/Boston: De Gruyter, 2019)</span></span></span></p> João Paulo Andrade Copyright (c) 2023 João Paulo Andrade https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2023-09-13 2023-09-13 7 1 11 Counterpublic and discursive public as crossing points https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica/article/view/5183 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.15cm; font-weight: light; line-height: 150%;" lang="en-US" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Montserrat Light;"><span style="font-size: small;">Willing to deal with issues based on repudiation actions of the visual arts in Brazil, in the 2010s, this article invests in the idea of “reception acts”. In this way, it brings to the foreground the agency of detractor publics, discussing it based on a comprehensive project of the phenomenon. For this, it uses Michael Warner's theory about the “counterpublic” and the correlate “discursive public”. These are mobilized as concepts favorable to the recognition, description and analysis of performative gestures linked to public discursiveness and the public sphere. Taking as an example the cases involving the 31st Bienal de São Paulo (2014) and the exhibition “Queermuseu: Cartografias da Diferença na Arte Brasileira” (2017), this approach seeks to think about the circulation and reflexivity acquired by artistic works, curatorial statements and sociopolitical agendas privileged by these artistic events among audiences. It focuses on those who proved to be able to elaborate and disseminate abhorrent versions of these “textualities”, to the point of producing real effects in the sequence, or even in the interruption, of the exhibitions. The movement of Warnerian notions, and their approximation with the situations reported in the text, allow us to rehearse the coining of <em>types</em> aimed at representing the discursive fulcrum of the conducts and unseemly rhetoric publicly practiced by actors with a reactionary profile in the face of artistic productions with a progressive bias.</span></span></p> Diogo de Moraes Silva Copyright (c) 2023 Diogo de Moraes Silva https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2023-10-08 2023-10-08 7 1 53 Limits, Perspectives and Next Steps https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica/article/view/5184 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.15cm; font-weight: light; line-height: 150%;" lang="en-US" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Montserrat Light;"><span style="font-size: small;">Public space has a latent configuration of counter-discursive manifestations. Cancel culture, as this digital phenomenon is known, has gained prominence in public debates for its form of externalization linked to ostracism, suffering various criticisms not only in media arena, but also in universities. If, on the one hand, there is a pessimistic view of the phenomenon, it can also be understood as a powerful discursive tool for many groups, such as certain counterpublics. In this article, we discuss various key concepts about cancel culture and counterpublics, arguing complementary points that intend to contribute to reflections on the topics. We seek to consider the multiple perspectives regarding the cancel culture phenomenon, adding a dialectical layer to debate. Thus, we try to understand how these objects can be closely connected in the logic of discursive field and open debate, in addition to proposing a breakthrough for the debate on cancel culture, which can also support counter-public studies.</span></span></p> Felipe Gabriel Ervaz Garcia Márcio Moretto Ribeiro Copyright (c) 2023 Felipe Gabriel Ervaz Garcia, Márcio Moretto Ribeiro https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2023-10-08 2023-10-08 7 1 21 Counterpublicity and thE Racial Politics of Palmares Cultural Foundation racial politics (2019-2022) https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica/article/view/5185 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.15cm; font-weight: light; line-height: 150%;" lang="en-US" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Montserrat Light;"><span style="font-size: small;">From 2019 to 2022, Palmares Cultural Foundation became a key topic in Brazilian public debates due to the ideas on racial issues defended by its President, the journalist Sérgio Camargo. This article examines how his mandate sought to suppress the State’s recognition of the ethnical-racial identity claimed by Brazilian black movements. In addition to the academic literature on the relationship between the Brazilian State and black movements, we investigate a research corpus that includes court decisions, government ordinances and notes, press and social media content. Our main goal is to describe the publics and counterpublics created by racial issues and the disputes on multicultural citizenship in Brazil.</span></span></p> Leandro de Paula Pedro Ayala Copyright (c) 2023 Leandro de Paula, Pedro Ayala https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2023-10-08 2023-10-08 7 1 51 Apresentação https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica/article/view/5193 <p>Apresentação editorial do Dossiê Temático Estudos de Contrapúblicos</p> Jonas Medeiros Fabiola Fanti Rúrion Melo Copyright (c) 2023 Jonas Medeiros, Fabiola Fanti, Rúrion Melo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2023-10-12 2023-10-12 7 1 18 Uma estranha criatura https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica/article/view/5194 <div class="page" title="Page 1"> <div class="layoutArea"> <div class="column"> <p><span style="font-size: 11.000000pt; font-family: 'LinLibertineI'; color: rgb(40.000000%, 40.000000%, 40.000000%);">Resenha de WARNER, M. Publics and Counterpublics. New York, NY: Zone Books, 2002. 334 páginas. </span></p> </div> </div> </div> Gustavo Frota Lima e Silva Copyright (c) 2023 Gustavo Frota Lima e Silva https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2023-10-12 2023-10-12 7 1 9 Sentir-se à margem pelas suas ideias https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica/article/view/5195 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.05cm; letter-spacing: -0.1pt; orphans: 3; widows: 3;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Linux Libertine;"><span style="font-size: small;">Tradução de artigo publicado originalmente em LOUAULT, F., De BARROS, M. e KERMOAL, K. (Orgs.) <em>Marges et marginalités au Brésil: Espaces, pouvoir et societé</em>. Bruxelas: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, 2022.<br /></span></span></p> Fanny Vrydagh Copyright (c) 2023 Fanny Vrydagh https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2023-10-23 2023-10-23 7 Ethics and Class Consciousness https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica/article/view/5210 <p lang="en-US" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Montserrat Light;"><span style="font-size: small;">Disputes over (or against) “orthodoxy” in relation to Marx’s thought played a fundamental role in the theoretical and political field of the communist movement at the beginning of the 20th century. In “What is Orthodox Marxism?”, Lukács resituated the terms of the discussion by declaring his orthodoxy to Marxism as a fidelity to the method. Marx’s method, which Lukács calls revolutionary dialectics, is presented on the basis of the unity between theory and practice, as the theoretical expression of revolutionary praxis. Precisely for this reason, Lukács sustains the controversial thesis that the condition of possibility of Marxist dialectics and the overcoming of reification is the standpoint of the proletariat as the identical subject-object of history. In the 100 years that have elapsed, the thesis of the standpoint of the proletariat has been the object of important criticisms. Faced with this, some authors have chosen to resignify and reinterpret this idea, while others have chosen to separate the critique of reification as an independent aspect from the political proposal of the revolutionary proletariat. The problem is that these formulations tend to distort the unity of theory and practice that is at the basis of Lukács’s formulation. After exposing Lukács’s critique of the phenomenon of reification and explaining succinctly what he understands by dialectical method, this article offers a reflection on the conditions of possibility of revolutionary dialectics, starting from a re-reading of the concept of class consciousness that emphasizes its ethical structure.</span></span></p> Fernando Quintana Copyright (c) 2023 Fernando Quintana https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2023-12-22 2023-12-22 7 1 41 Time’s carcass https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica/article/view/5205 <p lang="en-GB" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Montserrat Light;"><span style="font-size: small;">This paper examines Marx’s and Lukács’s concept of time in relation to the capitalist order of appearances. It argues that Marx as well as Lukács weaponized a certain understanding of abstract time for the critique of capitalism, that can be traced back to Kant’s transcendental aesthetics. It argues that time as inner sense (Kant) under capitalism becomes the inner sense of capital, understood as “automatic subject”.</span></span></p> Till Hahn Copyright (c) 2023 Till Hahn https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2023-12-22 2023-12-22 7 1 33 Reification and idealistic reductionism in Western thought https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica/article/view/5208 <p lang="en-US" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Montserrat Light;"><span style="font-size: small;">In this article we propose, from the reading of some texts by Georg Lukács and the Spanish-Salvadoran theologian and philosopher Ignacio Ellacuría (1931–1989), the hypothesis that reification is a constitutive problem of Western thought. Ellacuría contributes the need for a historicized perspective of the concepts that conceal reality, as well as a profound reflection on the concrete political problems implied by the persistence of what he calls ‘idealistic reductionism’ in philosophy. This reflection is very well complemented by the Hungarian philosopher’s approach of the problem of reification in <em>History and Class Consciousness</em>. Both the idealist reductionism that Ellacuría denounces and reification have in common the substitution of reality by static, ahistorical concepts, which constitute an ideologized appearance that conceals the reality of exploitation in our countries. The dialogue between Lukács and Ellacuría would bring a new dimension to the analysis of the problem of the coloniality of knowledge from a Marxist perspective.</span></span></p> Luis Alvarenga Copyright (c) 2023 Luis Alvarenga https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2023-12-22 2023-12-22 7 1 40 Reification https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica/article/view/5209 <p lang="en-US" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Montserrat Light;"><span style="font-size: small;">In recent years, various critics of Lukács’s work have subjected the concept of reification (<em>Verdinglichung</em>) to revision, either to point out criticisms and propose new readings of it, or to establish a defense of this category. This indicates that it is a theorization that still is valid in multiple aspects and continues to question the way in which capitalist society and the forms of consciousness that emerge from it are analyzed. In general, these studies focus their analysis on <em>History and class consciousness</em> and tend to omit the relevance and resonances that reification has in Lukács’s later work. This article sets out to analyze the category of reification historically, through a comparison between its conceptualization in the 1923 work and the <em>Ontology of Social Being</em>, on which Lukács worked in the last years of his life. In this way it seeks, on the one hand, to identify continuities and discontinuities in the content of the concept of reification and, on the other, to establish a series of necessary conceptual articulations; namely: to investigate how the passage towards an ontological perspective, mediated by the concept of labor (<em>Arbeit</em>) developed in the <em>Ontology</em>, implies a reformulation of the category in question and, at the same time, to integrate, also in the late period, the problem of reification in the broader framework of the study of alienation (<em>Entfremdung</em>) in social life.</span></span></p> Leonardo Bruno Lopresti Copyright (c) 2023 Leonardo Bruno Lopresti https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2023-12-22 2023-12-22 7 1 37 Lukács’s critique of irrationalism https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica/article/view/5207 <p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Montserrat Light;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span lang="en-GB">Challenging claims of a complete intellectual and political reorientation, this paper argues that Gyorgy Lukács’s post-war critique of the forms of irrationalism characterising reactionary and proto-fascist thinking in </span><em><span lang="en-GB">Destruction of Reason </span></em><span lang="en-GB">carries forward a critique of bourgeois philosophy looking back to Lukács’s critique of “The Antinomies of Bourgeois Thought” in </span><em><span lang="en-GB">History and Class Consciousness.</span></em><span lang="en-GB"> Part 1 examines Lukács’s claims in </span><em><span lang="en-GB">History and Class Consciousness</span></em><span lang="en-GB"> that Kantian philosophy and the oppositions it sets up – between theoretical and practical reason, science and morality, triumphant understanding and the unavailability of the totality and opacity of the “thing-in-itself” – reflect in the contemplative sphere the concrete contradictions of bourgeois-capitalist society. Part 2 shows how Lukács’s account of the genesis of modern philosophical “irrationalism” in Schelling directly situates this as arising out of the “problem of the irrational” reflected in the antinomies of Kantian critical philosophy, by positing an intellectual intuition putatively capable of transcending the limits of finite understanding and granting access (for an elite few) to an “abyssal” suprarational Ground of experience. In the concluding Part 3, we contend that, as </span><em><span lang="en-GB">Destruction of Reason </span></em><span lang="en-GB">tracks the devolution of philosophical irrationalism into far-Right ideology in the 20</span><sup><span lang="en-GB">th</span></sup><span lang="en-GB"> century, the 1933 essay “Grand Hotel Abyss” critiques the recurrent gesture of radical intellectuals to funnel their dissatisfaction at capitalist reification into exotic invocations of “spiritual crisis” which leave the political-economic dimensions of capitalist societies unexamined, because they lean on the same irrationalist premises established in Schelling’s irrationalist response to the antinomies of bourgeois thought. In the contemporary situation, as the far Right reemerges, and academic social critique continues to draw on premises drawn from irrationalism, Lukács’s position assumes new pertinence.</span></span></span></p> Matthew Sharpe Matthew King Copyright (c) 2023 Matthew Sharpe, Matthew King https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2023-12-22 2023-12-22 7 1 41 “Du musst dein Leben ändern” https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica/article/view/5206 <p lang="en-GB" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Montserrat Light;"><span style="font-size: small;">Nowadays, there is a prevalent opinion, although not well-supported, that the late Marxist Lukács’s work is essentially different from his early Marxist writings. This article claims precisely the opposite. Namely, that there is a categorical continuity between <em>History and Class Consciousness </em>and <em>The Specificity of the Aesthetic</em>, despite the changes in Lukács’s theoretical thought and political stance during the almost half-century period between the two works. More specifically, this article attempts to designate how the central categories of <em>History and Class Consciousness </em>(e.g. totality, reification, rationalization, imputed consciousness) appear in <em>The Specificity of the Aesthetic </em>and how these categories intertwine organically with Lukács’s main aesthetic categories (e.g. the particular, poetic choice, catharsis, evocation).</span></span></p> Spyros Potamias Copyright (c) 2023 Spyros Potamias https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2023-12-22 2023-12-22 7 1 29 The question of organisation https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica/article/view/5204 <p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Montserrat Light;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span lang="en-GB">One hundred years after its publication, </span><span lang="en-GB"><em>History and Class Consciousness </em></span><span lang="en-GB">remains an indispensable guide to social change. Contributing to the broader discussion about Lukács and critical theory today, this article explores aspects of Lukács’s contribution to a philosophy of the party, his distinctive approach to political practice and his defence of the alternative. Drawing from contemporary re-readings of his work, the concepts of </span><span lang="en-GB"><em>reification</em></span><span lang="en-GB">, </span><span lang="en-GB"><em>totality</em></span><span lang="en-GB">, and </span><span lang="en-GB"><em>mediation </em></span><span lang="en-GB">are explored highlighting the importance of the book’s often-overlooked final essay towards a methodology of the problem of organisation. Further, it draws attention to </span><span lang="en-GB"><em>Tailism and the Dialectic </em></span><span lang="en-GB">and the concept of </span><span lang="en-GB"><em>Augenblick</em></span><span lang="en-GB"> (“</span><span lang="en-GB"><em>moment</em></span><span lang="en-GB">”), shedding light on Lukács’s understanding of the complex relation between objective and subjective factors in the course of historic development. The above discussion is situated within the atmosphere of the early 1920s and the dilemmas and new challenges posed by the 1917 October revolution. At the same time, throughout his vast and often contradictory work Lukács offers concepts, methodologies, and tools to address the crucial theoretical and political challenges of the 21</span><sup><span lang="en-GB">st</span></sup><span lang="en-GB"> century. Until the end of his life Lukács devoted all his efforts to the renaissance of Marxism and remained committed to the cause even in the most unfavourable conditions. Thus, this article concludes with some reflections on Lukács’s potential revival and its significance for emancipatory perspectives arguing that in an era of political defeat and seemingly insurmountable strategic dead-ends, there is a lot to learn from his legacy.</span></span></span></p> Costas Gousis Alexandros Minotakis Copyright (c) 2023 Costas Gousis; Alexandros Minotakis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2023-12-22 2023-12-22 7 1 34 Lukács after Adorno https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica/article/view/5211 <p align="justify"><span style="color: #999999;"><span style="font-family: Linux Libertine;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span lang="en-US">Review of </span><em><span lang="en-US">Georg Lukács and Critical Theory: Aesthetics, History, Utopia</span></em><em><span lang="en-US">, </span></em><em><span lang="en-US">by Tyrus Miller</span></em><span lang="en-US"> (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2022).</span></span></span></span></p> Martin Platais Copyright (c) 2023 Martin Platais https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2023-12-22 2023-12-22 7 1 9 Georg Lukács and Critical Theory https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica/article/view/5227 <p>Portuguese translation of:</p> <p>CERUTTI, Furio. “Georg Lukács und die Kritische Theorie”. In: G. Flego; W. Schmied-Kowarzik (eds.). Georg Lukács – Ersehnte Totalität. Band I des Bloch-Lukács- Symposiums 1985 in Dubrovnik. Bochum: Germinal, 1986, p. 113–119.</p> Furio Cerutti Mariana Teixeira (translator) Copyright (c) 2024 Furio Cerutti; Mariana Teixeira https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2023-12-31 2023-12-31 7 1 10 A word by the author, forty years later https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica/article/view/5228 <div class="page" title="Page 1"> <div class="layoutArea"> <div class="column"> <p>Commentary for the Portuguese translation of “Georg Lukács und die Kritische Theorie” published in this volume (Dissonancia: Critical Theory Journal, v. 7, 2023, e2023030). The original text appeared in the vol. 1 of the proceedings of the 1985 Bloch- Lukács-Symposium in Dubrovnik.</p> </div> </div> </div> Furio Cerutti Copyright (c) 2023 Furio Cerutti https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2023-12-31 2023-12-31 7 1 4 Testimonies https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica/article/view/5229 Anita Chari Rüdiger Dannemann Ágnes Erdélyi Andrew Feenberg Antonino Infranca Konstantinos Kavoulakos Michael Löwy Michael J. Thompson Miguel Vedda Copyright (c) 2023 Anita Chari, Rüdiger Dannemann, Ágnes Erdélyi, Andrew Feenberg, Antonino Infranca, Konstantinos Kavoulakos, Michael Löwy, Michael J. Thompson, Miguel Vedda https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2023-12-31 2023-12-31 7 1 54 Presentation of the dossier https://ojs.ifch.unicamp.br/index.php/teoriacritica/article/view/5230 Mariana Teixeira Victor Strazzeri Copyright (c) 2023 Mariana Teixeira, Victor Strazzeri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2023-12-31 2023-12-31 7 1 17