Dissent in Representation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53000/sk279n87Keywords:
Politics, Republic, Democracy, SocialAbstract
The text revisits the distinctive politics-police typology, as set out in Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy, to investigate its relations within the political sphere, which Rancière (2014) identifies with democratic processes that, in addressing a wrong, reconfigure communities in relation to one another. To this end, the idea of a democratic and social republic (Rancière, 2022) is considered as the framework within which political dissensions, through different spheres of egalitarian subjectivation, also extend to representation, such that the disidentification with the common spreads into forms of representativeness, whose actions oppose identitarian reactionism.
Downloads
References
FJELD, A. Pratiques d’expérimentation. Cartographier les possibles avec Jacques Rancière. Dijon: Les presses du réel, 2025, 213p.
RANCIÈRE, J. O Desentendimento: Política e Filosofia. Tradução de Ângela Leite Lopes. 1ª ed. São Paulo: Editora 34, 1996. 138p.
RANCIÈRE, J. Et tant pis pour les gens fatigués. Entretiens. Paris: Éditions Amsterdam, 2009, 699p.
RANCIÈRE, J. Nas margens do político. Tradução de Vanessa Brito e João Pedro Cachopo. Lisboa: KKYM, 2014, 154p.
RANCIÈRE, J. Les mots et les torts. Dialogue avec Javier Bassas. Paris: La Fabrique Éditions, 2021, 96p.
RANCIÈRE, J. Les trente inglorieuses. Scènes politiques. Paris: La Fabrique Éditions, 2022, 228p.
Documento em meio eletrônico
FOUCAULT, M. “Omnes et singulatim”. Para uma crítica da razão política, 1981. Espaço michel foucault – www.filoesco.unb.br/foucault. Disponível em https://michel-foucault.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/2/1/13213792/omnes.pdf. Acesso em: 05 de março de 2026.
RANCIÈRE, J. Who Is the Subject of the Rights of Man? The South Atlantic Quarterly, n. 103, p. 297-310, [S.l.], 2004. Disponível em: https://cpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/sites.psu.edu/dist/d/37602/files/2016/01/Ranciere-Who-is-the-subject-of-the-rights-of-man.pdfRanciere-Who-is-the-subject-of-the-rights-of-man-copy.pdf. Acesso em: 10 de março de 2026.
RANCIÈRE, J. O dano: política e polícia. Territórios de filosofia, [S.l.], 2015. Disponível em https://territoriosdefilosofia.wordpress.com/2015/04/30/o-dano-politica-e-policia-jacques-ranciere/ [online]. Acesso em: 05 de março de 2026.
RANCIÈRE, J. L'excès des mots: pratiques de désidentification et logiques hétérogènes de la culture, Práticas da História, v. 1, n. 1, p. 185-214, [S.l.], 2015a. Disponível em https://www.academia.edu/36962172/Entretien_Jacques_Rancière_Lexcès_des_mots_pratiques_de_désidentification_et_logiques_hétérogènes_de_la_culture_Práticas_da_História_1_2015. Acesso em: 04 de março de 2026.
RANCIÈRE, J., Waks, Carvalho, Do Valle, Greco. Tomada da palavra e conquista do tempo livre: uma entrevista com Jacques Rancière, Educação e Pesquisa, São Paulo, v. 47, e202147002003, 2021b. Disponível em https://www.scielo.br/j/ep/a/hJpjH5QqsDN4RFdPbPgzXZP/?format=pdf. Acesso em: 04 de março de 2026.
RANCIÈRE, J. L’archive, c’est le témoignage d’actes de paroles qui marquent l’arrachement à une condition », une conversation en deux parties avec Jacques Rancière. Le grand continent, [S.l] GEG, 2024. Disponível em https://legrandcontinent.eu/fr/2024/02/09/jacques-ranciere-et-lhistoire-volume-1/. Acesso em: 04 de março de 2026.
Capítulo de livro
RANCIÈRE, J. O dissenso. In: Adauto Novaes (org.). A crise da razão. São Paulo: Companhia das letras, 1996a, 561p.
RANCIÈRE, J. Peuple, populaire, populiste: usage des mots. In: Ivekovic, R., Sardinha, D., Vermeren, P. (org.). Hégémonie, populisme, émancipation: perspectives sur la philosophie d'Ernesto Laclau (1935-2014). Paris: L’Harmattan, 2021a, 260p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hélder Matos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
